I don’t know how serious Al Franken was when he mused about running for the Senate again, but the thought of it made me sit up and pay attention. I’ve been hoping for just such an announcement, or something like it, for a long time. Anything to get him back in a place where he can use his considerable talents as both a savvy politician and a deliciously effective wordsmith.
But as soon as I say it out loud, I know I’m going to have to be prepared to defend him against even those on my side who think everything he did was vile and sickening and unforgivable. I don’t plan on going through all of that again. I did it enough while it was happening, and it’s starting up on Twitter and other places again, so I thought I’d share my original reasons here.
I wrote this post at my blog, Ramona’s Voices, in November, 2017, before Franken resigned, before more information came out about Leann Tweeden and her ties to the Right, and before more women came forward with their stories. (See link to Jane Mayer’s New Yorker article at the end) This same piece also appeared at Crooks & Liars.
I stand by my arguments, and I have no reservations when I say I would love to see Al Franken back in the senate. I doubt if he’ll do it if he has to primary another Democrat, but if one of Minnesota’s two senators decides not to run again, I hope he’ll give it some serious thought.
As always, I want to talk about it. What do you think? We’re all friends here. Remember that, please, even if you disagree.
Al Franken Shouldn't Resign
Â
Ramona’s Voices, November 17, 2017:
Yes, I'll say it, and I hope it's not too late: Al Franken should not resign. He shouldn't be forced to resign, either by the Democrats who (rightly) can't abide double standards or the Republicans who would love to see a Democratic knock-down. I can agree that what he did to Leann Tweeden was stupid, gross, and thisclose to sexual aggravation, and still want him to stay where he is.
Leann's story came out yesterday and it's shocking Sickening. I've read Franken's new book, Giant of the Senate, so I know he was no angel during his years as a funny man. He recounts in the book how even he had doubts about his past and how it would play when he ran for a job that followed in the footsteps of his hero, Paul Wellstone. Franken knew his state, knew his politics, had a great education, and was smart as hell--but his chief claim to fame was as a sometimes raunchy comedian. (He should have been a shady billionaire blowhard instead. Pure Teflon.)
The former Fox News reporter says he kissed her during a 2006 USO skit but went too far, tongue inserted where it wasn't wanted. (Note to men--and women, too--unless you're in the throes of hot passion, grinding face to face--both of you--don't try to stick your tongue down someone's throat. Coming as it does, unexpected and/or unwelcome, the recipient will gag on what feels like a cold, slimy slab of liver. You must know that by their reactions. Just don't do it.)
And worse, while Tweeden slept, Franken thought it would be cute to pretend he was groping her breasts, and even funnier, have his picture taken while doing it. (She was wearing a flak vest and it's not clear whether or not he actually touched her, but the picture is there and it's insulting, demeaning, and damning. Leann Tweeden has every right to be appalled by its existence.)
So, all that said, how could I, flaming liberal feminist, active #MeToo member, wish for Al Franken to go on working in the Senate? I confess I've been torn over this, asking myself why I should accept Franken's admission and apology and still go after Roy Moore or Donald Trump for their ugly sexual transgressions.
Well, yes, they're lowlife scum and don't deserve my defense--I agree--but I want the punishment to fit the crime. Franken has plenty to apologize for--gross, sexist stupidity is finding its day in court and, after so many decades of unfettered applications, it can't come too soon--and he has apologized. Twice so far, without the usual equivocations. He is as disgusted with himself as we are. Leann Tweeden accepted his apology. She said she doesn't want him to resign, adding that he does good things for the people of Minnesota while still acknowledging it was wrong and these things shouldn't be ignored.
She's right. They shouldn't be ignored. Spreading sunshine all over the place encourages women--and sometimes men--to come out of the shadows and tell their stories. We are at a crossroads now and we have to get it right. Sexual predators, no matter who they are, need to be exposed. We should, of course, look to punishment, but who gets to decide what form and how much?
Did Al Franken do something worthy of expulsion? There's the dilemma. I want women like Leann Tweeden to be able to come forward without consequence to tell their stories. I want the men who abused them to feel their pain, to get it, to show us they've learned from these revelations and will work to put a stop to a culture that has for too long equated power with the freedom to use sex as a right.
I believe Franken gets it. I want him to stay in the Senate because his work is important. Too important to set aside. He does good work there. He asks relevant, sometimes burning questions, does his homework, and works for the disenfranchised, the underdogs, the people hungering for attention to their condition. The loss would be painful.
I want him to work for us, against the Trump administration and the GOP majority, against any hateful agents who try to diminish or harm those of us without power. I want him where he can do the most good. I want him in the Senate.
*Note that this was written before seven other women came forward to say Franken groped them or pinched them or caused them discomfort with his childish sexual antics. He was wrong. Stupidly wrong. But was it ‘predatory’? Was he a ‘serial abuser’? As I understand it, whatever he did, he did in public, at least once when the woman’s husband was standing right next to her.
Again, no excuse, but did the punishment fit the crime? I never thought it did. Which is why I bring it up again.
FOR FURTHER READING: The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer wrote an intriguing piece on Franken in 2019, where she interviewed Franken and members of his staff, along with several Democratic senators, both male and female, who wished they hadn’t been so hasty and had allowed a hearing on the case. There was far more to this story than any of us knew when it was happening in late 2017.
I didn't want Franken to resign either (especially after I heard Tweeden was a Republican activist and was in on the "joke" picture) but, at the time, I felt a little gross about my willingness to let him stay in power. Now I feel better about my beliefs from back then as it's become clear that too many people acted in haste and he should've been given an opportunity to defend himself.
This whole situation is very complicated. I was furious that Kirsten Gillibrand basically had her presidential aspirations torpedoed because she was the one leading the charge against Franken. And I was iffy about us letting Joe Biden off the hook for his uncomfortable touching. Sure, he probably didn't realize the effect he was having but it was still part of his male privilege and feeling free to touch women however he wished. I've been touched by older men who probably didn't mean any harm and it still felt yucky.
Yet we do need a path for people to walk in order to learn from mistakes, atone, and do better. If they're willing to do the work, we need to allow them to have full participation in society. As a psychologist, it's almost a requirement for me to believe that (lol)! We're too quick to write people off when they've done harm. This is especially true for those who've served their time in prison. That's why I support restorative justice programs. We need better paths all the way around.
If Franken wants another try at the Senate and the people of Minnesota are willing, I'm fine with it. Honestly, even if he was guilty of groping all those women (and some of their stories were very iffy), he's still hurt a lot fewer people than my two senatorial horrors (Cornyn & Cruz).
I always think about what happens when people get reintegrated into our community. We need to call out abuse, give victims a platform to speak and believe them, investigate allegations, have fair proceedings, due punishment… yes to all that.
But what happens afterward? How does one show they’ve learned, are contrite, and won’t offend again? Victims are within their right to not forgive or forget. I just wonder that if Franken wants a seat, what will that road back look like?