Discussion about this post

User's avatar
prue batten's avatar

Ramona, I may not always comment on what I see as essentially USA business but in this instance, I think worldwide solidarity is what women need.

I'm the mother of a woman who was raped and viciously assaulted. It has scarred her for life. Fortunately no pregnancy ensued but if it had, I would have moved heaven and earth for her to get an abortion. Let alone for the perpetrator to be emasculated.

Generally, I'm peace-loving but I am loud and proud over basic rights, be they race, health and home, educational, environmental - whatever it takes to save this world from self-immolation.

So take it as a given that even if the subjects you write about are exclusively American, I will read them because I want to learn why different Nationals across the globe think the way they do. I may not comment, but I will always read.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Winthrop Alsop's avatar

Ramona, I feel your rage and I deal with it in myself. However, an article in the NY Times today gave me hope for the future.

“How a Year Without Roe Shifted American Views on Abortion.” It noted:

For the first time, a majority of Americans say abortion is “morally acceptable.” A majority now believes abortion laws are too strict. They are significantly more likely to identify, in the language of polls, as “pro-choice” over “pro-life,” for the first time in two decades.

And more voters than ever say they will vote only for a candidate who shares their views on abortion, with a twist: While Republicans and those identifying as “pro-life” have historically been most likely to see abortion as a litmus test, now they are less motivated by it, while Democrats and those identifying as “pro-choice” are far more so.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts